A California man, Ken Liem, has taken authorized motion towards three distinguished Asian-based banks—Fubon Financial institution, Chong Hing Financial institution, and DBS Financial institution—for allegedly facilitating a $1 million cryptocurrency rip-off.
The lawsuit, filed in a California district courtroom on December 31, 2024, claims that these banks failed to satisfy elementary monetary compliance necessities, together with Know Your Buyer (KYC) and Anti-Cash Laundering (AML) checks, which could have prevented the fraud.
Allegations Of Compliance Failures And Monetary Oversight
The lawsuit traces the rip-off’s origins again to June 2023, when Liem was approached on LinkedIn with what appeared to be a reputable cryptocurrency funding alternative. Over the next months, Liem transferred important funds into accounts held on the three banks.
These funds had been subsequently moved to third-party accounts, allegedly managed by the scammers. Liem’s authorized staff asserts that primary compliance checks might have revealed irregularities in these accounts, probably flagging them as suspicious earlier than important injury occurred.
Liem’s attorneys additionally argue that the banks concerned uncared for important KYC and AML measures, that are customary business practices designed to stop monetary fraud.
They declare that even a primary assessment of the accounts would have revealed inconsistencies, together with a scarcity of verifiable proof supporting the legitimacy of the account holders’ enterprise actions. The lawsuit states that the banks probably missed clear warning indicators and, in doing so, performed an oblique position in facilitating the rip-off.
Moreover, the go well with accuses the banks of violating the US Financial institution Secrecy Act (BSA), which mandates monetary establishments to keep up data of transactions and report any suspicious actions to the Monetary Crimes Enforcement Community (FinCEN).
On condition that DBS Financial institution operates a department in California and the transactions from Fubon and Chong Hing had been routed by way of Liem’s Wells Fargo account, the lawsuit argues that these banks fall beneath US regulatory jurisdiction.
This connection types the idea of the declare that the banks had a authorized obligation to behave on the suspicious nature of those transactions.
Authorized Implications And The Rising Risk of Crypto Scams
The lawsuit additionally highlights the involvement of Hong Kong-based enterprise entities—Richou Commerce, FFQI Commerce, Xibing, and Weidel—that allegedly funneled Liem’s funds to third-party accounts. These entities are accused of being intermediaries within the rip-off, serving as channels for laundering the stolen funds.
Notably, the case highlights the persistent vulnerabilities within the world monetary system, significantly within the context of cross-border cryptocurrency fraud schemes.
It raises questions concerning the duties of banking establishments in stopping such scams and making certain compliance with worldwide monetary laws. If the lawsuit progresses, it might set a precedent for holding banks accountable for failing to flag suspicious actions in crypto-related transactions.
Featured picture created with DALL-E, Chart From TradingView
