One of many largest questions shaking up the blockchain trade now’s whether or not profitable initiatives ought to stay loyal to the Layer 1 (L1) blockchains or strike out on their very own and launch their very own native chains, a choice that might basically alter the economics of networks like Solana.
Solana, with its excessive velocity and low fuel charges, has been on a meteoric rise over the previous couple of years. Its whole worth locked (TVL) has soared above $11 billion, largely fueled by the success of protocols like Jito, Jupiter, Raydium and different protocols. However right here’s the catch: all of this progress hinges on one factor—initiatives staying put.
What occurs if probably the most worthwhile functions, those driving Solana’s memecoin frenzy and DeFi growth, determine they now not want the community and migrate to their very own chains? May Solana’s financial mannequin unravel, its once-thriving income streams drying up as protocols transfer to seize extra worth for themselves?
So, is Solana—and, by extension, different L1s—constructed for the lengthy haul, or is the golden age of L1 dominance nearing its finish?
L1 blockchains have lengthy been the spine of crypto, however their continued existence has been partly due to the sheer exercise pushed by the protocols constructed on them. For example, 5 protocols contribute 85% of Solana’s TVL.
Extra initiatives are opting to interrupt free from L1 chains and set up their very own devoted blockchains, pushed by the promise of decrease prices, larger customization, and full governance autonomy. As an alternative of being confined to the principles and limitations of a general-purpose L1, they’ll tailor their infrastructure, management transaction charges, and dictate governance insurance policies with out exterior interference.
Price effectivity is a significant component on this exodus. On an L1, community charges fluctuate wildly based mostly on demand, making transactions unpredictable and infrequently costly. For top-frequency merchants and DeFi platforms, these prices can add up rapidly. Sovereign chains enable initiatives to set their very own financial fashions, guaranteeing steady and predictable charges that profit each builders and customers.
Then there’s customization. Whereas L1s like Ethereum and Solana provide strong ecosystems, they power protocols to adapt to predefined community constructions slightly than optimizing for his or her distinctive wants. A venture launching its personal blockchain good points the liberty to tweak consensus mechanisms, block occasions, and transaction processing speeds—a bonus that may be game-changing for sectors like gaming, DeFi, and high-speed buying and selling.
However maybe probably the most compelling purpose for this migration is governance. Protocols constructed on an L1 stay on the mercy of that community’s core builders and governance choices. A sudden change in transaction charges, validator incentives, or block manufacturing mechanisms can disrupt their total operation. Transferring to a sovereign chain eliminates this danger, permitting initiatives to make choices that align solely with their imaginative and prescient and group pursuits.
A number of high-profile initiatives have already embraced this transition:
dYdX, a number one decentralized derivatives change, initially launched on Ethereum however later migrated to a Cosmos-based sovereign chain. The transfer allowed dYdX to optimize its infrastructure for high-speed buying and selling whereas gaining full management over governance and transaction prices.
Jupiter, Solana’s second-largest protocol by TVL at $2.814 billion, is at the moment debating whether or not to observe go well with, with proponents arguing {that a} devoted blockchain might improve efficiency and mitigate dangers tied to Solana’s community congestion or governance shifts.
Polygon, initially launched as an Ethereum Layer 2 (L2) scaling answer, has since expanded right into a multi-chain community. With the introduction of Polygon Supernets and the Polygon CDK (Chain Improvement Equipment), the venture is encouraging builders to construct application-specific chains that operate independently whereas nonetheless being interoperable with Ethereum.
DeFi protocols owe a lot of their success to the ecosystems that nurtured them, but the very nature of crypto encourages autonomy. The extra these initiatives develop, the extra they query whether or not they should hold paying hire to L1s after they might personal the land outright.
The attract of breaking free from Layer 1 (L1) blockchains is plain—decrease charges, full autonomy, and the flexibility to fine-tune infrastructure to suit a venture’s precise wants.
However is sovereignty actually the golden ticket it seems to be?
Stepping away from a longtime L1 is greater than only a technical improve; it’s a high-stakes leap that comes with critical trade-offs. Whereas some protocols dream of independence, historical past has proven that L1s provide a basis that’s extremely tough to interchange.
One of many largest causes protocols thrive on L1s is liquidity. In DeFi, liquidity isn’t only a nice-to-have; it’s the lifeblood of the ecosystem. Ethereum, as an example, boasts over $60 billion in Whole Worth Locked (TVL)—a deep ocean of capital that just a few blockchains can rival.
When a protocol launches on a serious L1, it immediately faucets right into a ready-made market of merchants, buyers, and liquidity suppliers. However the second it decides emigrate to an unbiased chain, issues get sophisticated.
Liquidity doesn’t simply observe innovation—it follows comfort. Convincing customers and liquidity suppliers to maneuver to a brand new, unproven community isn’t any straightforward feat. dYdX needed to provide important incentives to lure customers to its new Cosmos-based chain. With out sturdy incentives, a venture dangers fragmenting its liquidity, creating skinny markets the place slippage will increase and buying and selling turns into much less environment friendly.
Then there’s safety. L1s like Ethereum and Solana have spent years battle-testing their networks, constructing strong validator participation and safe consensus mechanisms. A protocol that strikes to its personal chain should both recruit and keep its personal validator set or depend on a shared safety mannequin like Cosmos’ Interchain Safety. Neither choice is easy.
A weak validator set could be disastrous—living proof: Meter (MTRG), a smaller Layer 1 community suffered a $4.4 million exploit in February 2022 as a result of vulnerabilities in its bridge safety. Attackers exploited poor validator incentives, minted additional tokens, and drained the community’s liquidity. Many smaller chains have suffered related fates, struggling to ascertain the financial and technical safety wanted to stop assaults.
Past liquidity and safety, L1s present one other essential benefit: community results. The fantastic thing about an ecosystem like Ethereum is its composability—protocols don’t function in isolation; they combine, stack, and construct on one another. A lending protocol can join seamlessly with a buying and selling platform, a yield aggregator, or a liquidity pool, creating an interconnected net of economic functions. That’s why initiatives like Uniswap, Aave, and Curve proceed to thrive on Ethereum; they’re leveraging the collective energy of the ecosystem.
However, unbiased chains should construct these connections from scratch. With out an lively developer group and established infrastructure, they danger changing into remoted islands in an ocean of blockchain networks.
Even when a protocol manages to copy all these options, one closing hurdle stays: person migration. Altering blockchains isn’t nearly decrease charges or technical enhancements—it’s about shifting person habits. Individuals have a tendency to stay with what they know, and until there’s a compelling purpose to modify chains, they received’t. Pace, value financial savings, and scalability are nice promoting factors, however they might not be sufficient to beat the inertia of a well-established L1 ecosystem.
On the finish of the day, protocol sovereignty appears like a daring step ahead, but it surely’s a raffle with no assured payoff. L1s provide extra than simply infrastructure; they supply safety, liquidity, and a thriving ecosystem that’s extremely tough to copy.
The continued debate over protocol sovereignty versus ecosystem dependency isn’t new. It echoes previous discussions in regards to the roles of Layer 1 , Layer 2 , and even the comparatively current one about Layer 3 options in blockchain growth.
RELATED: Are Layer 2 Options Enhancing Ethereum-or Killing It?
In the end, the blockchain trade isn’t a zero-sum recreation. Whether or not L1 chains thrive or fade will rely not simply on their capability to retain protocols, however on how successfully they adapt to new fashions of scalability, governance, and interoperability.
If historical past is any indication, the way forward for blockchain won’t be outlined by a single dominant method however by a dynamic stability between innovation, sovereignty, and community collaboration. L1s, L2s, and even application-specific chains can coexist, every fulfilling totally different wants.
So, will unbiased chains really redefine the blockchain panorama, or will they wrestle towards the gravitational pull of L1 ecosystems? The reply might form the way forward for DeFi—and all the blockchain trade.
Interoperability presents a compelling center floor. As an alternative of shedding high-value protocols totally, L1s might pivot to changing into seamless bridges between unbiased chains, facilitating liquidity movement, governance coordination, and cross-chain composability. This transformation wouldn’t mark the tip of L1 relevance—it may very well be their subsequent nice evolution.
Simply because the web thrived by linking disparate networks slightly than holding them siloed, blockchain’s future could lie in connectivity slightly than competitors. L1s that embrace this shift might safe their place not as walled gardens however because the highways enabling an interconnected, multi-chain world. The query isn’t whether or not L1s will survive—it’s whether or not they may adapt quick sufficient to stay on the centre of blockchain’s subsequent frontier.
Disclaimer: This piece is meant solely for informational functions and shouldn’t be thought-about buying and selling or funding recommendation. Nothing herein needs to be construed as monetary, authorized, or tax recommendation. Buying and selling or investing in cryptocurrencies carries a substantial danger of economic loss. All the time conduct due diligence.
If you want to learn extra articles like this, go to DeFi Planet and observe us on Twitter, LinkedIn, Fb, Instagram, and CoinMarketCap Group.
Take management of your crypto portfolio with MARKETS PRO, DeFi Planet’s suite of analytics instruments.”
