Along with probably hurting Storm’s protection, Klein’s letter to the court docket steered that Decide Failla’s ruling could have contravened one of many federal guidelines that govern prison proceedings. Primarily, Klein argued that the federal government can not legally compel the protection to reveal the names of its skilled witnesses until the protection has requested the identical data from the prosecution. Storm’s protection “deliberately made no such request,” Klein wrote, as a way to maintain their witness record non-public.
